Yeah, It's a truth, Muslims are Terrorists! ... Lol no, it's a jokle! ( Yeah, i think it's possible to laugh of everythings, but not with everybody!) Problem of this question it's you have to ask than every muslims are not terrorists, it's an evidence! True question is Islam is a religion who invite to terrorism ? Islam is a violent religion ? Islam is a dangerous religion ?
I'm in France and in the south of France. As my country have a lot of links with African country (who was french colony during a long time) a big part of our population is composed by population of theses country (Algeria, Maroc, Tunisia, Senegal, etc...) And often or everytime, theses populations are Muslim! So i'm in a country who is one of the more exposed at this "problem", this question!
I have a lot of friends who trust in Muslim Religion, and i respect it, but to be honnest, i don't like this religion. And i don't want that muslims wants to be offended by this, it's my choice, and i think it's better to me to be honnest and say my opinion than say "yes yes" even if i'm not agree and be unethical! You have to consider my honesty as a respect mark!
If i don't like this religion, it's because as a lot of religions, Islam imagine to possess unic truth! All other religions are estimated as false by Islam. I don't say it because i support Christians, It was the same thing with Christianism in Europe, when this religion was imposed as the one and unic. Theses 2 big religions can't admit than somebody else have the truth. And 2 Unic truth, it's impossible... so they are in oposition!
Only worshiping can if they want say "i accept somebody else can trust other thing than me, but it's not what is saying in the sacred book, it's the fidel who accept to be tolerant in spite of his religion, and not thanks to... this is an independent idea of the fundamental text.
So What i don't like too, it's peoples who are saying terrorists are false, they misunderstand what is saying in the sacred book... they misunderstand! it's just an interpretation problem... the text let an interpretation place. If pacific and comprehensive interpretations are presents, war interpretation too and theses are two possible interpretations, no one is better than other because it's interpretations. it's not becaus peace interpretation is more nice than it's the better!
It's a text who can be Ambiguous.
And to finish, i don't like because it's a conqueror religion. It's in link with precedent idea: if you believe to have the truth, you want to diffuse this truth!
So, you know why i don't like this religion, but i admit than the main european religion, Christianism had the same problems during 20 century! Even if actualy this religion is retracted and maybe more adjusted with "good" feelings than before, i could make the same critize for this religion.
Terrorism is not a muslim problem. Unhappy, KKK terrorist existed, and they are against Muslims too... members of diferent sects could be terrorists without be muslim! independentists could be terrorists, but they arn't all terrorists!
I have a lot of muslim friends and i'm happy: they are not terrorists! XD They trust, it's their choice and i respect it even if i'm not oblige to be agree or to like what they like.